Trump Wrestles With Clinton’s Legacy in Buenos Aires

Dear Money & Crisis Reader,

Bill Clinton pushed through some egregious policies in his time.

But there was one bill that was so far-reaching and economically destructive that we’re still dealing with the effects today.

In fact, President Trump was wrestling with it this very weekend…

With his presidency’s dying breath, old Bill pushed through a deal that would pave the way for China’s admission to the World Trade Organization (WTO), kicking off a decades-long Chinese boom at the expense of American jobs back home.

In the months that followed China’s admission to the WTO, dozens of American companies moved their factories to China. And between 1999 and 2010, one-third of all U.S. manufacturing jobs disappeared over the horizon to the east.

Clinton’s intentions were desperately transparent in retrospect.

The deal was nothing more than a last ditch effort to create some sort of legacy that would outlive the infamous scandal that dogged his second term.

He had a theory that China’s admission to the WTO would usher in a new era of free trade, eventually leading to the democratic reform of The Red Dragon. He honestly believed he would go down in history as the person who lit the fuse for the democratization of China.

Of course, that’s not how the situation played out.

In the years since, the Communist Party has leveraged the resulting economic boom to sink their claws deeper into the country and its economy. They instilled party leader Xi Jinping as China’s leader-for-life — China’s first since the dictator Mao Zedong.

And while China’s been reaping the benefits of its WTO membership, it has failed to hold up its side of the bargain.

As Trump’s trade representative Robert Lighthizer pointed out in a 2017 report on China’s WTO compliance:

Almost two decades after it pledged to support the multilateral trading system of the WTO, the Chinese government pursues a wide array of continually evolving interventionist policies and practices aimed at limiting market access…

China is determined to maintain the state’s leading role in the economy and to continue to pursue industrial policies that promote, guide and support domestic industries while simultaneously and actively seeking to impede, disadvantage and harm their foreign counterparts.

These broken WTO promises are at the heart of Trump’s trade war, which appears to be in a cooling period, following talks at the G20 summit in Argentina this weekend.

Over dinner, Trump and leader-for-life Xi Jinping discussed the terms of the trade war. And for the first time, they agreed to ease back on some of the proposed tariffs and penalties.

But geopolitical analyst Jim Rickards says this ceasefire won’t last long. He explains why in today’s issue of Money & Crisis.

All the best,

Owen Sullivan

Owen Sullivan
Editor, Money & Crisis

P.S. After more than a decade of secrets, Jim has revealed this incredible information.You might not know this know this… but Jim was involved with developing a special tool while working with the U.S. government.

“Project Prophesy,” as it’s come to be known, can predict surprising political and economic events before they happen. Click here and Jim will tell you everything.

The Trade Truce Won’t Last

Jim Rickards“I will not be the one to break the peace we have made here today.”

With those words, the Godfather, Don Corleone, ended the war among the five mafia families in New York.

This weekend the eyes of the world were on Buenos Aires, where President Trump, China’s President Xi Jinping, and some top aides had a private dinner to discuss the current China-U.S. trade war.

When I saw the photos of the dinner on Sunday morning, my mind flashed back to the dinner scene from The Godfather.

In the movie version, no one in the room trusted anyone else. But all of the participants deemed it in their best interests to make a peace treaty so they could return to their illegal businesses without the disruption of hit men, police investigations and vengeance.

There would be time for that later. In the short run, it was more beneficial for everyone involved to normalize the situation.

The same dynamic prevailed in Buenos Aires this weekend.

All of the key parties were at the table. Trump’s team included Mike Pompeo (secretary of state), John Bolton (national security adviser), Robert Lighthizer (U.S. trade representative), and Steven Mnuchin (secretary of the Treasury) among others.

The Chinese team was led by President Xi Jinping and included the top figures in Chinese trade and finance.

No one trusted anyone from the other side. Trump knows the Chinese have lied about their good intentions on trade for decades. Likewise, the Chinese know that the U.S. does as much hacking and surveillance aimed at the Chinese as they do to us.

Fans of The Godfather know that the “peace” arrived at in the dinner scene did not last long. In due course, Michael Corleone takes over the Corleone family. When Don Corleone dies, Michael plots his revenge on the rival families. In the climactic scenes, all of Michael’s top rivals are assassinated. This results in peace being restored because there is no one left to oppose Michael and his power is dominant.

The same is true in the trade wars. What happened in Buenos Aires is like a truce or a timeout, but the war itself is not over.

90 Days to Make it Work…

For his part, Trump agreed to delay imposing new tariffs on China after Jan. 1, 2019. Specifically, increased tariffs (from 10% to 25%) on $200 billion of Chinese imports will not go into effect.

Xi agreed to buy a “very substantial” amount of increased U.S. exports from the agricultural, industrial and mining sectors of the U.S. economy.

Meanwhile, both sides agreed to new negotiations on forced technology transfers, financial cyber attacks, and theft of intellectual property.

This agreement has a 90-day life. If substantive progress is made, the concessions may be extended along with new structural agreements that reflect progress on the issues to be negotiated.

If the negotiations are a failure, then the U.S. tariffs will be imposed and China will presumably resume its bad behavior in the intellectual property and cyberattack arenas (if they ever stop it in the first place).

Based on past behavior, the prospects for an end to the trade war are not good. While this pause may benefit both sides for political reasons, none of the underlying issues have been resolved and the likelihood of resolution is still low.

The Chinese are infamous for playing for time. They offer some happy talk and vague promises, and negotiating partners such as the U.S. accept the offer in the hope that “this time it’s different.”

It never is.

The Chinese did not offer to buy a specific quantity or a specified amount of goods from the U.S. They agreed to opaque phrases such as “very substantial.” How much is that, exactly?

The Chinese also offered to address “legitimate” U.S. concerns about theft of intellectual property. What if the Chinese don’t consider our concerns to be “legitimate”?

In the end, the Chinese could offer token concessions and use the 90-day window to cook up new happy talk. Their hope will be that after 90 days of negotiations and some minor concessions, the U.S. will be reluctant to break the peace or impose the additional tariffs.

The 90-day period will also give the Chinese lobbyists time to gin up opposition to tariffs from U.S. agricultural importers. This is an important political constituency for Trump as we move closer to the 2020 presidential election season.

Trump needs support from agricultural states like Missouri, Iowa, and Wisconsin to win his second term as president. It seems the Chinese understand U.S. politics better than most Americans.

The Chinese are also notorious for saying one thing and doing another. They will gladly sign an agreement that calls for reductions in the theft of intellectual property and then turn around and keep up the thefts (perhaps with a more covert method).

Since their admission to the World Trade Organization in 2001, the Chinese have consistently broken their word when it comes to trade. They will do it again once they tie the U.S.’ hands-on tariffs.

The Light at the End of the Tunnel for Investors

The good news for the U.S. is that the Chinese tricks are fairly well-known by now. Trump’s most trusted and powerful adviser on trade is Ambassador Robert Lighthizer, who was at the dinner. Lighthizer sees the Chinese promises for what they are: a litany of lies.

If substantive improvements with adequate verification cannot be agreed upon by April 1, 2019, Lighthizer is ready to immediately raise tariffs on China. President Trump agrees with Lighthizer and will not hesitate to raise the tariffs.

At that point, the trade wars will be back with a vengeance.

With this much distrust and Chinese bad faith in the air, what’s the best way for investors to play the likely re-emergence of the trade wars in April?

Certain sectors that are likely to benefit, regardless of which way the trade wars turn out. The most important sector is gold and gold mining.

China has tentatively agreed to buy more output from the U.S. mining sector as part of its temporary trade-war peace treaty with the U.S. The largest and best-managed gold producers in the U.S. also produce other metals that are in high demand by China including silver, copper, iron ore, lithium, and cobalt.

A lift in purchases by the Chinese from miners will lift the gold price alongside the prices of those other strategic and industrial metals.

Conversely, if the U.S.-China trade war resumes in full force, gold will continue its recent rise as a safe-haven investment. In recent years, both U.S. Treasuries and gold have provided a safe haven for investors.

But Treasuries have taken the lion’s share of these capital flows. If China and the U.S. go back to the trade wars, Chinese purchases of U.S. Treasuries will decline.

This will make Treasuries an unattractive destination for investors worldwide — leaving gold as the only unaffected safe haven.

All this puts gold in a win-win position. Gold miners will rally if China keeps its promise to buy more mining output. Gold bullion will rally if the trade wars resume.

Either way, gold and gold miners are winners.


Jim Rickards

Jim Rickards

P.S. This could be my most important message for the New Year.

To date, the CIA has given clearance to fewer than 100 people in the entire world involved with this project. But as a tax-paying American citizen, you deserve to know the truth.

NOTE: This short clip has NOT been sanctioned by the United States Intelligence Community.

Click herefor all the details on “Project Prophesy.”

Owen Sullivan

Written By Owen Sullivan

Owen Sullivan isn’t a millionaire or one of the Wall Street elite. He was just one of the many folks who was hit hard when the housing bubble burst… and decided he was never going to let that happen again. Since then, he’s worked with industry experts to develop strategies and techniques to bulletproof his finances — and yours — against the next crisis. His methods don’t require years of financial experience. These are simple strategies that anyone can follow. After all, financial prepping shouldn’t be reserved for a select few.