- Google enters the video game market like a wrecking ball
- Disney buys Fox’s catalog of sexy shows for $71 billion
- The federal government will give you $1,000 if you take one of these darn horses off their hands
- Lyft’s blockbuster IPO bodes well for Uber… and backdoor investors
Player One Has Entered the Game
Google enters the video game market like a wrecking ball
Google’s been in video games for about 10 minutes and it’s already stepping on some toes (and when Google steps on toes, it wipes out entire industries).
Yesterday, at the 2019 Game Developer’s Conference in San Francisco, Google announced its new disruptive gaming platform, Stadia.
What’s in a name? Stadia is the plural “stadium.” Google is saying its platform is like a collection of video game stadiums. It’s a little dry for my taste (should have called it Mega Blaster 720) but I see where they’re going with this. More on that below.
Google has never been content to simply join an existing industry. Like a new roommate who rearranges your furniture, Google is a disruptive force. And its first foray into gaming is no different.
The Stadia isn’t a piece of hardware like an Xbox or PlayStation. It isn’t a top-of-the-range gaming PC. But it will cut into their market share all the same.
At its core, Stadia is a cloud-based, video game streaming service.
Essentially, instead of running your game on your console or home computer, the game is run on one of Google super powerful computers and then streamed to you like Netflix or YouTube.
Theoretically, this means you could run AAA games with ultra-high graphics, without having to shell out for an expensive PC or console.
You simply log in to Stadia on any internet browser, computer, smartphone, or smart TV, and let Google’s supercomputers do all the hard work. (About time they put them to good use.)
If successful, this would be a deathblow for companies like NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) who make their bread and butter selling the graphics cards needed to play the best-looking AAA video games.
According to Google’s Majd Bakar, Stadia can stream high-end games at 60 FPS (frames per second) with HDR and 4K resolution (that’s good). And in the future, Majd predicts Stadia could go as high as 120 FPS and 8k resolution (that’s better).
For the love of the game
Google’s presentation was high on hype, low on details. Google demonstrated two AAA games running on Stadia, but this demonstration was a single user playing in a controlled environment.
Google will be potentially streaming to millions of players at once. All of whom will have different internet speeds and different kinds of hardware.
Any slowdown or delay in response will be seen as a total failure.
Especially to players of competitive multiplayer gaming, who Google will desperately need to court if they want to succeed in this market. (A Mountain Dew and a bouquet of Doritos, m’lord?)
Remember when I said Google named its service Stadia to evoke a network of video game stadiums?
Well, this makes it clear who Google’s target demographic actually is:
That’s the Staples Center. The same place the LA Lakers and LA Clippers play professional basketball on national television.
And it’s sold out… to watch folks play video games.
This is part of the competitive gaming revolution folks are calling eSports (if you put sports in the title people won’t call you a nerd).
Last year, this rapidly growing “sports” trend brought in a revenue of $906 million.
But if Google could actually pull off cloud-based, video game streaming, that would revolutionize the industry forever.
By cutting out the need for a high-end computer, Google would be opening up the world of gaming and eSports to a much larger market. Anybody, as long as you have internet access, could play the newest AAA games and compete in eSports competitions.
And there’s one tiny company who stands to make a fortune from that growth.
This is what my researchers call a pick-and-shovel play. Basically, we don’t invest in the massive companies driving the trend, like Google or Microsoft. They are too expensive and their growth is dependent on a multitude of factors outside of this trend.
But a small company, that produces goods and services that cater to that trend, has the potential for enormous growth. And they stand to profit, no matter which company comes out on top.
Disney Buys Fox’s Catalogue of Sexy Shows for $71 Billion
After months of negotiation, Disney (NYSE: DIS) has finally closed its $71.3 billion acquisition of 21st Century Fox’s (VIENNA: FOXA) assets.
And you know what that means…
The House of Mouse now controls the FX cable network, as well as Fox’s movie and television production studios.
Which means the self-proclaimed “family-friendly” corporation now owns the R-Rated superhero Deadpool, as well as adult-orientated FX shows like AmericanHorror Story and Pose. (Maybe a cameo from Mickey and Donald would soften their image?)
Disney’s deal, which was so big it had to be approved by the Department of Justice, was locked in just in time.
As Dollar Trade Club’s Alan Knuckman writes, Disney is gearing up for a major launch, and it’s going to need as much content as possible to support it:
Shareholders are not crazy about how much money Disney is spending on media content.
But I think Disney’s finally got what it takes to break out of its funk…
Disney’s highly-anticipated video streaming service, Disney+, debuts this year.
Investors will get their first peek at this potential Netflix-killer during the company’s investor day on April 11.
Simply put, Disney (as well as Apple, Amazon and every other company under the sun) wants to compete with Netflix. And to do that they need content.
The Walt Disney Company is in a unique position where it holds the rights to almost 100 years’ worth of its own content. But the vast majority of it skews towards a younger audience. (Somehow, I don’t think 51-year-old John Brown from Idaho wants High School Musical 3 on demand.)
So, instead of making their own sexy adult shows, Disney went out and acquired Fox’s adult shows. It remains to be seen whether or not this $71.3 billion gamble will pay off.
What would it take for you to sign up for Disney’s streaming service? Is this the worst movie in the history of acquisitions?
Click here to email me and tell me your thoughts. We’ll feature the best in tomorrow’s Readers’ Comments section.
The Federal Government Will Give You $1,000 if You Take One of These Darn Horses Off Their Hands
Imagine the surprise on your family’s faces if you walked in the door tonight with $1,000 in your pocket and a 2,000-pound horse.
Interested? Well, have I got good news for you!
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is offering $1,000 to anyone who adopts one of their “wild horses.”
The agency is launching this adoption incentive program to encourage folks to adopt any of its “untrained” burros and horses.
Under the program, adopters will receive:
- $500 within 60 days of adopting the animal
- And $500 within 60 days of titling the animal
How can the BLM afford this?
Well, your teenage daughter may not want to hear this, but horses are $#%@ing expensive.
According to a survey by the University of Maine, the average cost of horse ownership is about $3,876 a year. Which means for every horse the BLM pays to get rid of, they’re making a potential saving of $2,876 a year.
Oh yeah, and why don’t we multiply that by about 50,000? That’s how many unadopted animals the BLM cares for every year.
Do you think anyone will take them up on their offer? Are you in the market for a wild, untamed beast? Have you any experience with adopting a horse in the past? Click here to email us and tell us your story.
ONE LAST THING
Lyft Blockbuster IPO Bodes Well for Uber… and Backdoor Investors
Well folks, the Lyft IPO is oversubscribed.
After the second day of its IPO roadshow, demand has already exceeded the 30 million shares Lyft planned on offering.
(Is IPO Roadshow a good idea for a TV show? Maybe I’ll give Disney a call. They seem desperate for content right now.)
If Lyft can keep this up, that will only drive its predicted share price of $68 and valuation of $23 billion even higher.
One investor (who sounds like he was literally drooling) told MarketWatch that he’s buying every share of Lyft he can and he expects the company will be 10x oversubscribed by the time the company goes public.
This is a little surprising considering Lyft lost $911 million in 2018. But even with bum financials, Lyft is just too hot a deal to miss out on.
This bodes well for the Uber IPO, which is set to launch in a few months and shatter records as the largest IPO in U.S. history.
Of course, the success of Uber and Lyft’s IPOs doesn’t really affect regular investors like you and me.
Early Lyft investor Carl Icahn is on track to pocket $1.23 million when the company IPOs next week.
Which is nice for Carl, I guess. But regular old investors legally could not invest in Uber or Lyft pre-IPO. (We’ll talk about why this is stupid another day.)
That’s why my team look for backdoor investments — companies that will profit directly and indirectly from the success of these IPOs. The best part is these companies are usually cheap to buy into and have room to grow spectacularly.
How cheap? Well, my research squad has tracked down a tiny company that’s currently trading for just $15. And its making an itty-bitty piece of technology that’s integral to Uber’s plan to change the world of transportation forever.
Right now its flying under the radar. But according to my researchers, that won’t last for long. Once Uber goes to IPO, the cat will be out of the bag.
Closing Data for 3/19/19:
|S&P Index 500||2,832.93||0.00%|
Click here to send us your comments and tell us what you think. Do you agree with us? Do you think our ideas are stupid? Bring it on. We can take it.
Manafort does not deserve to go away for a long time. 5-7 years should be adequate. It seems he got caught by accident, doing things that many others are doing in circumstances similar to his. Bearing in mind that leadership is a role that goes both up and down the chain of command, the fact that he was able to get away with this sort of behavior for so long is just as much an indictment against the regulatory agencies as it is against him.
— Stephen W.
I bet there are tons of folks running similar schemes to Manafort that have been able to fly under the radar until now. But there’s nothing that motivates change like a good old scandal. Once the details of Manafort’s alleged crimes come to light, I predict we’ll see a crackdown on crimes of that sort. Of course, that won’t mean the regulatory agencies will actually be any better at their job.
When you control the media, you can get away with anything! Buying the [Washington] Post was cheap insurance for just such a situation.
— Mark G
Or you could go down the Peter Thiel route and pay for an aging wrestler to sue them into oblivion. On a totally unrelated note: I definitely did some stuff I wasn’t proud of when I was in college. Maybe I should make a “donation” to the ole campus newspaper.
Editor, One Last Thing