Laissez Faire Today

The Laissez Faire Club Daily e-Letter

How Hunger Games Benefited From Online Piracy

Young_Entrepreneurs_Guide_to_Starting_and_Running_a_Business240x372

So you want to see Hunger Games when it comes out on Thursday at midnight? It’s not likely that you will get the chance. Tickets in my community have been sold out for weeks. In fact, the first 10 showings of the film are sold out. This disappoints me greatly because it is one of the few teen flicks I’ve really wanted to see.

The whole phenomenon seems set to make the Harry Potter hysteria and the Twilight mania seem like warm-up acts. Ask around among teens, and you will hear this confirmed. This is a true example of mass frenzy. Actually, the whole thing seems like a modern “madness of crowds.” It’s “pandemonium,” as People magazine put it.

Both the plot line and the marketing genius have lessons for our time.

Based on a book by Suzanne Collins that came out in 2008, the film tells the story of an impoverished, totalitarian society in which rebellion among the subjects is punished by the creation of a killing game for mass entertainment. A teenage girl is put in the position to kill or be killed, but she cleverly plots to stand up to the regime by cooperating with her opponent. Together, they win the hearts of the crowd and bring the regime to its knees.

In other words, it is a story about personal freedom against a powerful state, a tale of courage and defiance in the face of power. The reviews by actual readers (versus professional critics) are over the top. It’s Amazon’s No. 1, and it has 4,000 reviews and counting. This is a phenom.

Aside from the plot line, there is something contemporary about the theme of sheer deprivation and survival. It sums up the way young people are looking at the opportunities they are being presented in these times. We aren’t playing hunger games yet, but when an entire generation is pretty sure that it will not fare as well as its parents’ generation, that’s not good. Life seems like the zero-sum game posited in the film.

The marketing guru behind the push — and don’t kid yourself, for everything needs marketing — is Tim Palen. He began his work three years ago. He used social media to the max. He had video and smartphone app games created. He tweeted constantly. He made puzzles based on finding pieces within Twitter. He worked on amazing posters and pushes of every sort. Not one day went by when he and his staff weren’t pushing some button. (He is also likely to lose his job after this but that’s another story.)

But here’s another thing to know about this. There is no point in marketing — and it certainly doesn’t work over the long haul — if the essential product isn’t good. You have to have both: good selling technique and something good to sell. Only then does the magic happen.

A number of media outlets have examined his strategy, and it is fascinating to see how it all unfolded, all based on the idea that this movie would work only if users themselves were empowered to spread the word. The experts and insiders were kept at bay. The kids were the targets, and they were the ones that the producers relied upon to make this happen. Such is the way stuff works in the digital age. The guys in the boardroom matter only once they figure out that they need to reach the kid on the street.

But in all the marketing roundups I’ve seen, I’ve seen no mention of what might in fact be the central thing that made this book and movie take flight. It came to me in talking to teens themselves. I asked many: Where did you read the book? The answer comes immediately: online. Online? How is that possible? I thought we were living in times when piracy was punished by death or something close to it.

Well, try this for yourself. I searched for “Hunger Games free online.” In about one second, I had access to the full text for all the books, in every format: PDF, doc, txt, rtf, html, and epub. Even audio. It is amazing. And following all these links I see search engines posting notes about how they have taken down many links based on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. What this means is that there is at least some perfunctory effort to keep these books offline.

It’s not working. And thank goodness. These kids have become wild for this book and therefore dedicated to seeing the move, buying the shirts, and otherwise doing the whole teen-mania thing. True, the books are selling but, let’s face it, not every parent is willing to shell out money for their young teens to buy books about kids killing kids in a dark, dystopian world.

I’m speculating here but I suspect that a major reason for the insane success of these books and movies — easily the most spectacular teen freak out of our time — is that dread thing called piracy. That’s right, piracy. Except that it is not stealing to read something online. It takes nothing away from anyone. No physical property is stolen. Intellectual property is being shared, copied, duplicated, multiplied.

But wait just a minute. Isn’t the whole energy of the leviathan state swinging in to gear to stop this very thing, all in the name of saving private enterprise, even though the most successful book of our time is universally pirated like few things I’ve ever seen? That’s exactly right. And therein rests the amazing perversity of all this anti-piracy mania. The state is seeking to shut down the sharing of information, the very source that has given life to so much enterprise in our time.

Some authors are figuring this out. The remarkably successful writer Paulo Coelho writes on his blog: “As an author, I should be defending ‘intellectual property’, but I’m not. Pirates of the world, unite and pirate everything I’ve ever written! The good old days, when each idea had an owner, are gone forever.” You see, as a writer, he believes in ideas and he believes in his work and wants it to achieve a universal destination. He has also noticed that the more people read him, the more money he makes.

So get with it, writers and producers and publishers. Look at this case as just another one among thousands. Piracy is your friend. Only second-rate writers and publishers are hip to enlist the state to crack down on people’s desire to know more. You can’t succeed through blackmailing people to buy infinitely copyable products. Successful enterprise comes from giving people want they want, enticing the imagination, and finding ways to profit from people’s desires. You can’t achieve that by stringing people up.

Hunger Games has so much to teach the world: the power of the individual, the evil of the state, the wickedness of the zero-sum game. Maybe it can also teach us that a major initiative by the state today to end Internet piracy is also rooted in fallacy. Sharing information is not a zero-sum game; it is a market process, a joyful area of play in which everyone can win.

  • http://www.inthatdayteachings.com Robert Winkler Burke

    Something in this everything for free trend, makes the brilliant superbly rich, but any pour soul with the misfortune of being less than brilliant… then doomed to never hope to be rich?

    Copyright law enabled the Industrial Revolution, did it not?

    If I had a duplication machine in a shop somewhere, should I be able to borrow a Mercedes S Class and copy it freely? To copy a Gulfstream jet? A Steinway piano? A Ford F-350 diesel truck? A VW Jetta for my children? Furniture for my house? Paintings for the wall? Books for the library? TVs and computers for entertainment and work? Tools for the garage? … And when robots appear, shall I copy them too?

    Is free copying of another’s work… another form of slavery.. stealing the sweat of another man’s brow?

    Reductio ad absurdum indicates there’s a limit to copying freely another brain’s work…

  • Jim Dandy

    I stand corrected, inasmuch as Jeffrey Tucker’s own books ARE available for free online, and can be downloaded at Mises.org – “Bourbon for Breakfast” and “It’s a Jetson’s World”. (And they are, of course, delightful.)

    As to how he makes money when I download them for free, I have no idea. Perhaps the lecture circuit, as suggested below. He is surely a more creative monetizer of his talents than I of mine…!

  • Quentin

    I agree 100%. Books should be freely available in pdf, epub and mobi formats. It wont stop people writing books. Authors can make money from the lecture circuit or perhaps product placement. Please provide links to free mobi and epub versions of books in the Laissez-Faire collection. I have been unable to find an online version of ” the twelve year sentence” and I am desperate to read it. Laissez Faire books should not be about making money, it should be about spreading the gospel of global deregulation and formenting pockets of nietzcherian capitalist anarchy.

  • Jim Scamman

    Maybe if I put it another way you can understand. When I go to the library and borrow a new book (copyright still in effect) and then read it, am I or the library engaged in an act of piracy? When I purchase a book and read it, and then give it to my brother, who reads it and gives it to his friend, are we all engaged in acts of piracy? In the 60′s when I bought blank tapes and recorded my records on tape and made mixtapes for friends, was I engaged in piracy? When I went to the video store and rented a movie that was clearly a VHS copy, was I engaging in piracy? The examples are endless. When I go to the library and use the Xerox machine and copy pages from books when I’m doing research, is this piracy? If all these acts are criminal, then arrest the President of Xerox, then me. You’re all barking up the wrong tree. Why were the executives of Maxell never busted? They made blank tapes. And why would anyone imagine a world without intellectual property? That is absurd. Perhaps you should imagine a world where people are taught that sharing is good.

  • Jim Scamman

    Value-added is the key. Even if I read a book online, I might want to own it, depending on the book. Or own other works of the author that are not online. Or own other forms of media based on the interest that was created in me by the original experience online. A new paradigm has been created and the old guard just doesn’t want to buy into it. So live with your belief that the earth is flat if you’re old guard, but leave the rest of us alone. Didn’t you learn anything from the Salem Witchcraft Trials?

  • Pingback: Catching Up - Gold Speculator

  • http://peacerequiresanarchy.wordpress.com/ PeaceRequiresAnarchy

    Supporters of IP will likely point out that despite how Hunger Games may have benefited in some ways from online privacy (as you argue), as a whole it does benefit from the existence of IP laws.

    And I am not afraid to concede this point, despite being against all forms of IP.

    IP laws undeniably help certain people very much. For example, JK Rowling would not have made as much money if it weren’t for IP laws.

    One should be careful not to make the false assumption that IP laws help all creative people who come up with great ideas make money, however. (On this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhBpI13dxkI )

    Further, regardless of whether or not IP laws benefit certain people (regardless of the fact that IP laws may benefit the creators of Hunger Games), this does not change the fact that it is immoral to threaten peaceful people with violence to prevent them from using their own property to create copies of certain “intellectual works” such as a copy of the book or movie Hunger Games.

  • Jim Dandy

    The seventh commandment is, “Thou shalt not steal.” Let’s say that I’m offering a contract to you, and the terms are: here are my words (or music, or images). If you want to access them, you have to pay me for permission. If you say, “no, I don’t accept your terms,” do you still have a “right” to my creative work? That’s the root of the problem of internet piracy: I want to sell something, and you don’t want to buy it; you just want to have it without compensating me (or whomever), its creator.

    The argument may be made that these books (or movies or music) that are being “viewed” online without payment are not lost sales inasmuch as those people who can get it for free wouldn’t have gotten it at all if they had to pay for it. But that’s a straw-man argument. The basic point is, is it acceptable to steal? Steal what, you ask? The creative output of someone else, I answer.

    By your own arguments, it makes no sense to have Laissez-Faire Publishers. Simply post the complete texts of your books online, in every format: PDF, doc, txt, rtf, html, and epub. Even audio. And then see whether the more people read you, the more money you make. Where does the money come from?

  • Benjamin Booth

    The waist created by copyright and patent law is hard to fathom. Jeff, your statement:

    “You can’t succeed through blackmailing people to buy infinitely copyable products”

    has a powerful inverse:

    “Wealth comes through the knowledge and production capacity of hard-to-reproduce things (that people want).”

    If the creative and productive armies of copyright and trademark-dependent people spent their energy in what was truly hard to create and reproduce, we’d all have far richer lives today.

  • Craig Haynie

    I am glad that this marketing strategy is working for Suzanne Collins, but imagine a world without intellectual property; where her book won’t be the only one on Amazon.com, where hundreds of others will copy it and publish it on Amazon.com; where movie companies will forgo the royalties and permission to make her story into a movie; and where dozens of people sell the merchandise. Indeed, without intellectual property, she might not make enough on the book to continue the sequel.

  • Pingback: ARTICLE | How Hunger Games Benefited From Online Piracy — Prometheus Unbound