Laissez Faire Today

The Laissez Faire Club Daily e-Letter

Fifty Shades of Government

50ShadesofGovernment

On a flight the other day, I noticed that a third of the passengers were reading a certain best-selling book. It got me thinking.

Every politically active group wants something from government, and government is happy to oblige. It’s even more obvious in the election season, and it’s only going to get worse as we approach November.

Another way to put it: Government has lots to give in the way of laws, loot, privileges, protections and punishments. Every pressure group and political party has an idea about how its power over us needs to be used.

Does it make any difference who gets the loot, really? Not really, not to you and me. Whether you are taxed to make bike paths in Palo Alto or to fund reconnaissance missions in Kabul, you are still denied use of your money so that politicians and bureaucrats can realize their dreams. Whether the regulations say that you can’t work for less than $10 per hour or that you can’t buy raw milk at any price, your freedom to make contracts is still being compromised.

We can and will argue interminably about how government ought to be used. Should government prevent gay people from contracting unions or stop private companies from discriminating against people who chose gay unions? Either way, the state is being brought in to tell people what they can and can’t do. In this sense, the left and the right have more in common than either side cares to admit: Both have a plan for how the state can better manage the social order.

Should tobacco be banned or bailed out? Should banks be made too big to fail or badgered with regulatory restrictions so they can’t do real business? Should corporations be protected and subsidized, or should they be taxed within an inch of their lives? Should fatty foods be mandated as part of a national diet or kept off the menu as a health hazard?

These are the great debates of our time. But these are actually not fundamental debates at all. Either way, the only real winner here is government, its agents, its public spokesmen, its powers and its place in our lives and the culture. This is what remains unquestioned.

Should seniors be able to rob young people of their earnings in order to enjoy a luxurious retirement, or should seniors be especially taxed and punished for using more than their fair share of society’s health care resources? Whichever way that debate ends up, liberty itself suffers, and the property rights of everybody are less secure.

Should religious people be able to control what we watch, read and smoke, or should secular people be able to impose laws that keep religious people from having too much influence over our culture? Either way, government is being granted more control over the social order than it should have.

This is the great tragedy of living under leviathan. People have different ideas about how it ought to conduct its affairs. Who should be rewarded? Who should be punished? Who gets the privileges? Who must bear the cost? It becomes a war of pressure groups, everyone seeking to live at the expense of everyone else.

What is this thing we call government? It consists of the gang with an institutional structure that makes the rules, enforces the rules, and lives by rules that are different from those it imposes on the rest of the population. We can’t steal, but government can. We can’t kill, but government can. We can’t counterfeit, kidnap, and engage in fraud, but government can. This thing called government, obviously, has a strong interest in maintaining its power, prestige, and funding.

This is true no matter what the structure of the government happens to be. Oligarchy, absolute monarchy, constitutional monarchy, presidential republic, parliamentary republic, democracy — all of them have one thing in common: They create a special caste of citizens that live at the expense of everyone else.

In a democracy especially, government enlists us all in its cause. So long as people are arguing about how to use the government, and not whether it should be used to achieve social and economic goals at all, the government comes out the winner. All the pressure groups are really just rewarding the political class, transferring power and money from us to them. Precisely what the excuse is — and it changes all the time, sometimes subtly and sometimes dramatically — doesn’t matter to government.

Government is a chameleon, pleased to wear any cultural or ideological cloak to blend in with its social and cultural surroundings. In a wrangling, struggling, grasping, dog-eat-dog democracy like ours, there are fifty shades of government, each suitable for a particular time and place, each adapted to purposes of the moment, all with the interest of firming up control by the ruling class.

This is what the “political spectrum” is all about. Government dominates and we submit. It puts us in bondage and we obey its discipline. There’s also got to be a good excuse or else we would never put up with this. We have to believe that the government is, in some way, at some level, doing something that pleases us. Maybe even the government is us!

People say that in the “age of faith” of the Middle Ages, religious differences led to wars. Historians who have looked carefully have noticed something different. Governments that want wars are happy to use religion as the excuse.

And so it is today. In the “age of science,” we get scientific social planning in which experts are supposed tell the people with their hands on the controls how to use them. But whether the excuse is religion or science, security or the environment, nationalism or internationalism, it doesn’t matter to the rest of us. The rights and liberties of the people paying the bill are forever being sacrificed to someone else’s political agenda.

So come November, we will drag ourselves to the voting booth and look at the names and try to remember what these various people promise to do for us and to us if we ratify their right to rule. Having done so, we are told that we’ve made our choice and now we must live with it.

But maybe it is not really a choice at all. Maybe it is time to let go of our dependency and reject the entire master-slave relationship that is the whole basis of the system itself. Fifty Shades of Government has been the best-seller for hundreds of years. It’s time that the governed write an entirely new book.

  • http://www.gods-kingdom.org messianicdruid

    “You shall have no other gods [ rulemakers ] before me.”

  • Rick

    You are right, of course Jeff. Thanks for the article.

    Unfortunately I find that a lot of the libertarian movement is devoted to hacking at the branches of the state rather than striking at the root. We need libertarians like you and many others to start going on msm venues and websites and make the case for why the state is illegitimate and the market is preferable.

    @Virginia- economic science proves otherwise.

  • Chuck Stewart

    Glad you are still going to be around. I don’t comment too much on your “writings”, but I do enjoy reading them.

  • Amy Liorate

    One way to look at Virginia’s statement is to say that everyone would be *equal*… we should all like equality.

    But everyone still wouldn’t want the same things. So in a short time some would spend half their million while others saved most and spent very little.

    Some would get to 400 lbs while others exercised more and/or ate less. Equal protection doesn’t mean equal outcome.

    If people all woke up with an equal status one day they would still go out and do what makes their own self happy!

    So what is different now? If you fear white males who are double your weight you can buy mace or a gun and the playing field is more level. If you want more than $25K who is holding you back? Some deliver pizzas, others sell makeup.

    Government might restrict you from having or carrying mace and weapons, corporations want to get those things to you and have them when you need them. Corporations don’t care about your sex or height unless you’re buying clothes.

    A Friedman quote comes to mind:
    “Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself.”

    I’m also a little perturbed that Ms Nancarvis chose to make everyone white, rich and heavyset. So long as you’re going to make everyone identical why not Asian, Hispanic or African?

    Why not a healthy weight; female and 155 lbs?

    I’m always bothered by people who advocate for the status quo because they have no faith that their fellow man won’t murder and plunder. I find that most people are good and prefer living by the golden rule. Maybe there is some self reflection in all of this.

  • Robert Rice

    Virginia, What service is the government offering you that is not better served by those evil corps? Name a service, beyond thievery that Big G preforms better than the private sector, just 1.

  • http://emspeaks.wordpress.com Emily Jacobs

    I have nothing to add, except to say that this, by far, is the best thing to emerge from the existence of “Fifty Shades of Grey.”

  • Matt Tanous

    “the only way laissez faire would work is if we all were 250lb six ft white males with at least $1,000,000 in the bank (in the U.S.)”

    Fallacies abound! Anyone who buys what you are selling, Virginia, is the fool. Your objections have been answered and dismissed so often as to make bringing them up to be ludicrous.

    Let me ask you this. When you go to a restaurant, does the server give you the wrong order because you are not a six foot white male with millions in the bank? Or does he give you the correct order most of the time merely because you (and your friends/family) won’t come back (and thus the business will likely fail) if he doesn’t?

  • http://lfb.org/today/fifty-shades-of-government/ Virginia Nancarvis

    This is bull crap..the only way laissez faire would work is if we all were 250lb six ft white males with at least $1,000,000 in the bank (in the U.S.) Anyone that thinks “everyone for themselves” will not evolve into plunder, murder and mayhem is a fool. The government may be fifty shades of gray and is not perfect..I’ll take it any day over depending on corporations good graces or those that have a distinct advantage over a 5ft 2inch 130lb woman with an annual income of $25,000. those

    • Bob Robertson

      You are conflating “equality of opportunity” with “equality of outcome”.

      I’m not a 6 foot 250lb white male either, and I don’t have to be. That 6 foot 250lb white male has exactly the same opportunities for education that I do, exactly the same opportunities for food, for pretty much everything else, except government. Government will favor the short, disabled black woman over him because that way they meet a quota. And THAT is injustice just as much as it would be if the tables were turned and being a 6 foot 250lb white male was what was beneficial.

      Maybe you dislike that I’m more interested in meeting a 5’2″ woman of any shade than any 6 foot 250lb white male. Golly, I’m discriminating on the basis of sex and weight! How dare I?

      I will echo another’s question to you: What service does govt provide that you consider better provided than by private enterprise?