Laissez Faire Today

The Laissez Faire Club Daily e-Letter

Drop the Freon and Come out With Your Hands Up

CFC

“All the profits of drug trafficking and none of the risk.”

That’s how the prosecutor in a federal criminal case described Carlos Garcia’s smuggling operation that has landed him in the federal pen for 13 months.

Before wearing leg irons and striped pajamas, Garcia was a top executive in Marcone Inc., a leading supplier of home appliances. Today he is just a statistic, the newest addition to the world’s largest prison population.

His crime: He was the mastermind behind Freaky Freon Friday. On this day, the company would distribute to wholesalers and repairmen, at low prices, the thing that millions desperately want but cannot otherwise get, thanks to federal regulations. They want HCFC-22 to fill air-conditioning units… so that their offices and homes can stay cool.

It has been illegal for two years to sell units that use it. But nearly all existing units use the old coolant. Importing HCFC-22 is severely restricted. The government’s idea was to drive up the price, making it too expensive to maintain existing units, and thereby somehow inspire manufacturers to invent things to make us all more virtuous. But replacing units with unproven technology is expensive and risky.

When there is money to be made, through perfectly legitimate desire to keep people cool indoors, some people will “break bad” and go outside the law. Three years ago, the stuff sold for $55 per canister; now it sells for $140. It is produced in China, the label on the canister is changed, and then it is hidden among vast other cargo, imported to the U.S., repackaged, sent to Mexico, and sent back again. Apparently, this circuitous route is the safest and least detected.

Mr. Garcia was caught simply because the only office of the Justice Department that specializes in  “environmental crimes” is in Florida near the office where he ran the operation. Garcia was the victim of a wiretap and a sting operation, as The New York Times reports. He was probably aware that what he was doing was technically sketchy, but he was unable to expunge from his mind the consumer-service ethic. His job was to make people cool.

Meanwhile, illegal HCFC-22 operations carry on all over the country, a fact we know because the street price of the coolant is falling even as demand is increasing. It’s profitable contraband.

There are no restrictions on coolant in Mexico and most other countries in the world. It is still legal to actually make it in the U.S. and export it. It just can’t be legally sold here. Nevertheless, people will stop at nothing to get it, especially given that more than half the country would be uninhabitable without air conditioning and that 90% of the existing units need coolant, and will for a long time in the future.

The hot war on cooling has only just begun. But roots of it all date back to the 1970s with the regulatory attack on aerosol, later becoming an attack on CFC, and then ramped up to abolish the CFC replacement HCFC, and we’ll see how long its replacement is for the this world. The goal, as you surely recall, was to stop the hole in the ozone layer — a thing that’s been out of the news since the real goal of passing the regs was achieved.

Now it turns out that the ambition is broader. Environmentalists are insisting that we turn up the temperature in our house to 85 degrees and just learn to live with it. The regulatory press (i.e., The New York Times) is running articles about how incredibly scary it is that many countries in the world are demanding ever more air conditioning.

No kidding. Air conditioning is an essential part of the civilized life. And that is precisely what government hates about it. That’s because ever more in our times, government is devoted to taking away everything we love.

Of course, the regulators have “science” to cite to justify the attack on our happiness. The scientific evidence of some relationship between our cool living rooms and the melting Earth runs all directions. Not knowing enough about the technical aspects, count me as a skeptic. There is just something mystical and wacky about this whole notion.

Modern-day primitives are just too quick to imagine that a boiling planet is Mother Nature’s way of forcing propitiation on us for our sins of man-made prosperity and comfort. Government loves these people because they provide a cloak for control and regimentation. There is always a scientist happy to cash a check from the government to confirm the pagan faith. Their data always evade that critical question of causation.

H.L. Mencken defined a puritan as someone who has a haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy. It is true with regulators too. They have a haunting fear that someone, somewhere, might be using technology in a way that brings comfort and convenience to life. They are seeking to crush this at every turn, and air conditioning is high on the list.

Meanwhile, the list of banned and soon-to-be banned products is growing. We are being hectored for our burgers, hounded for our sodas, denounced for smoking, jailed for growing pot, told to use less water, to use less energy in everything, to drive bikes, not cars, fussed at for having lawns, told to stop indulging ourselves with ice makers and large houses — even indoor plumbing is under fire.

They want to take it all away from us and manufacture some alternative universe in which we are happy as can be growing our own food, turning our toilets into compost pits, and cooking over an open fire, provided we don’t cut down trees. Government has settled on these poverty-creating policies because it apparently realized at some point that it could not contribute anything toward make us better off, so it does more of what it is good at: spreading human misery and calling it good.

But it is not working, because these policies are contrary to human nature. Mankind wants a better life. That’s most of what we do here on Earth. We struggle our way through the vale of tears called scarcity to make and get more and better. That’s the very meaning of the process of living. We don’t respond well when a bully says you cannot have access to a good or service that would improve your life. You must learn to accept your downgraded state of being.

At some point, we recognize that it is not worth it to surrender all to our powerful masters.  These policies are driving us all toward “breaking bad,” a phrase drawn from the popular television show in which a chemistry teacher becomes a meth manufacturer in order to provide for his family. No, we are not making meth, but we are doing lots of things we aren’t supposed to do.

Breaking bad takes many forms. We drink more than we should and then work to drive extra safely. Don’t gasp; probably two-thirds of the drivers in my town on a weekend night could be jailed for DUI, and the same is true of your town. People buy extra pseudoephedrine in off months to stock up for bad times, technically acting as smurfs just to clear our clogged noses.

We hack our shower heads and our hot water heaters. We buy pirated products and stream videos illegally. We smuggle in Spanish ham in our bags, bring back Cuban cigars from our travels, pay and receive in cash instead of credit cards, search for gas stations that sell cornless gasoline, and drive across state lines to get our TSP so our clothing can get clean.

We are choosing to be outlaws, rather than chumps, and, as such, are ever more willing to recognize how impossible and undesirable it is to comply, rather than live a good life. In fact, the forbidden fruit is attractive to us. We want raw milk, home remedies, real light bulbs, cheap meds from Mexico, sketchy software from Thailand, off-the-books jobs, “counterfeit” sunglasses, and pirated shoes and handbags from anywhere.

Thanks to the Internet, the rebellious spirit in our bones, and the impossibility of stopping it all, we are all breaking bad and getting used to it.

In a country where everything wonderful is becoming illegal, and everything depreciated and inferior is mandated, this is the only way to live. To comply is to accept the status of poor slaves; to break bad is to leap into the speakeasy economy with trepidation but at least some hope of an improved life.

There are ways around the regulatory Nazis, but you have to be creative. I’ve assembled 12 of the ideas in a single report called “Hack Your Showerhead and Eleven Other Ways to Get Around Government.” This report singled the dawn of a new epoch at Laissez Faire Books: to embrace not just the theory of liberty, but its practice as well.

The new Laissez Faire Books began a Club of people dedicated to this goal. We gather to read the e-books distributed every week. These are classics and new works. I wish I could tell you some of the offerings that are coming, but this much I promise: there are books coming that no one else on the planet would be willing to risk publishing. Regardless, each book comes with a video and an opportunity for group engagement to inspire more learning and more liberty each day.

No, we never asked permission to start this Club. It’s our way of joining the mass movement. Break bad with us and join the Laissez Faire Club.

  • Pingback: Tucker: Rzuc freon i wyjdz z podniesionymi rekami Instytut Misesa – Ekonomia i Szkoła Austriacka

  • Pingback: Rzuć freon i wyjdź z podniesionymi rękami! | Wolne Centrum Informacji

  • http://marezilla.com Zilla

    I had mild asthma that was easily dealt with for over 30 years on the rare occasions that I had an attack with two puffs from my old albuterol inhaler that had CFCs. A few weeks ago, my old inhaler puffed its last and I was given the new HFA inhaler because the gov’t outlawed my safe and effective asthma medicine to appease climate change hysterics and huxters. it made my asthma worse and now I have pneumonia and am coughing up blood while taking half a dozen different meds just to try to keep from dying. I have to use a machine to get life saving asthma medication into my closed up lungs because the HFA in handheld inhalers makes it impossible to breathe, so now even if I recover from the pneumonia I will be a shut-in because there will be no life saving rescue inhaler to carry in my purse for emergencies. Where is the black market for CFC asthma inhalers? I am ready to “break bad” just to keep from dying because I have young children who need their mother and also, because I kind of like being alive. This ban has already killed people but the FDA’s answer is “get used to it” – in those exact words! It was nearly 200 dollars to get the medicine that goes in the machine to let me breathe and that was for ONE WEEK’S SUPPLY! My old inhaler was under ten bucks and lasted for YEARS before needing to be refilled, which is why this stupid ban is only killing me now.
    A lot of the other stupid bans are simply inconvenient (well the new light bulbs are poisonous, but they don’t make you die right away like the HFA inhalers do), but taking away medicine that people need to LIVE over ‘environmental’ concerns when there is NO PROOF that the inhalers really were hurting anything is just insanity! The dead rotting bodies of the suffocated will likely put more gasses into the precious atmosphere than our life saving inhalers ever did.
    Too bad there is no easy way to “hack” an inhaler or build your own CFC rescue inhaler (and if there IS a way, please let me know so I can get my life back). In the past two years, asthma deaths have increased, as have the numbers of people who have had to go on disability; asthmatics who were working and functioning JUST FINE with the occasional use of CFC rescue inhalers who can no longer breathe properly and therefore can no longer work, and there are people like me who are sensitive to the HFA who have been actually sickened by this additive. We are being murdered by political correctness.

  • Pingback: Speaking of the Constitution… « economicharmonies

  • Kerry W. Greene

    YO BUTTHEAD, SO YOU THINK MY 83 YEAR OLD MOTHER SHOULD HAVE TO SCRAPE, BEG, BORROW OR WHATEVER TO COME UP WITH $10,000.00 TO REPLACE A 6 YEAR OLD UNIT THAT DOES NOT NEED IT.I CAN ONLY HOPE YOU ARE WELL ENOUGH OFF TO BE ABLE TO DO SO. IF SO PLEASE SEND THE ABOVE QUOATED PRICE SO MY MOTHER WILL NOT DIE FROM HEAT EXPOSEURE. IF NOT THEN GO AWAY. THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Coyne Tibbets

      Unless it breaks, she doesn’t have to. R22 can still be recovered from existing retired refrigeration and used in older conditioners to beyond 2020. It’s only manufacture of new R22 that’s being phased out then.

      If her AC is 6 now, it’ll be 14 in 2020 and will likely have cratered from other reasons. Like mine did, year before last: 15 years old, compressor dies, irreparable. When something like that happens, you have to fix it anyway, and R22 won’t help.

      I’m sure the R22 from my old home is now happily cooling some other person’s home.

      • Justen

        Eh whomever told you an air compressor is irreplaceable or irreperable was lying to you to get you to spend more money. I just had one replaced last year in an old unit. Seems like that might be a pattern in your life, although for the record I do understand the risks associated with CFCs.

        • Coyne Tibbets

          Mine was an off-brand that some i—t property manager obtained from who knew where. A brand that stopped making air conditioners and replacement parts for the same 10 years ago. (For most brands, maybe you might be right.)

          I had it looked at by 3 separate companies and all were stymied.

  • Kerry W. Greene

    The refrigerant R22 NEVER WAS AND STILL IS NOT AN OZONE DEPLEATING COOLENT. On the other hand R410A is worse then R22 could ever be. Just more lies from our Goverment that loves to lie and lie to us. I can only hope that we can get rid of the LOW LIFE MAGGOTS IN GOVERMENT, NO JUST THE ANICHRIST NOBAMA. TIME TO CLEAN OUT THE CLOSET OF ALL THE TRASH.

    • Coyne Tibbets

      Actually, that is exactly backward. R22 is a highly chlorinated fluorocarbon (CFC) which is ozone depleting.R410A is a mix of fluorocarbons (HFC’s) and is not ozone-depleting because it doesn’t contain chlorine.

      Ozone destruction is a specialty of chlorine, which reacts with 2 ozone molecules to destroy them and finds itself free to go on and do the same with two more. It’s like dominoes. Bromine can do the same, but isn’t as common in the atmosphere, at least not yet. But fluorine binds to tightly with other atoms to act as a similar catalyst.

      • Coyne Tibbets

        “to tightly” –> “too tightly”. Sigh.

  • Coyne Tibbets

    Libertarians think they can dump whatever poisonous putrid slop they want into the creek, so that the flaming, fuming, noxious poisonous mess crosses my land, and I just have to live with that because it would infringe their precious freedom if I asked them to stop. What about my freedom to enjoy my land?

    Not the same thing, you say? Yes, it is. The ozone hole is a proven consequence of the HCFC’s. But to admit that would require you all to surrender some of your “precious freedom” (read: money). So instead you slapped those blinders on your face and shoved those earplugs in your ears and won’t even consider the evidence. “Even if HCFC’s do cause the ozone hole, so what?” you say, “If the ozone hole opens up and scorches some other country, that’s their problem; because the only way I’m giving up HCFC’s is when they pry them from my cold dead hands.”

    So this is a PERFECT example of why Libertarianism is utterly unworkable. Libertarians are fine with freedom when it’s THEIR freedom; everyone else can just suffer so they can be free.

    Not true, you say? How about if I’m the one dumping poisonous putrid slop in the creek that is running through YOUR land: Are you fine with that? If you aren’t, then what about MY freedom?

    The really serious proponents will counter that all proper Libertarians willingly cooperate together to recognize a problem and solve it. My response: “Great! So do that, and stop complaining about not being able to use HCFC’s. Recognize the problem and work with the rest of us to solve it. Even if that should result in your having to shell out for a new air conditioner.”

    And at that point, the hemming and hawing starts…and once again Libertarians show their true colors.

  • Nathan Marciniak

    It does certainly seem that the state wants to drive society towards the stone age, however the people in government, as monstrous as they may be, are still people like us. Surely they want the same goodies that markets provide for themselves. I wonder what their plan is to ensure that the bureaucrats and regulators still get the Good Stuff for themselves whilst simultaneously denying it to everyone else?

  • http://www.readjohnhunt.com John Hunt

    Jeffrey—another angle on the freon:
    CFC used to be used as propellant in asthma inhalers. It’s use in the US amounted to 4.5 tons/year, about as much as China manufactures in 1/3 of a day (China statistic not confirmed).
    So, the EPA and FDA ban the CFC propellant in the asthma inhalers in a process that the doctors were trying to delay in order to save their patients, and that finally culminated in the implementation of the ban in December 2008, as if that is going to help the ozone layer.

    The effect?
    Well, the asthma inhaler market, which was low margin because of generics that allowed cheap medicine for all who wanted it, suddenly was highly lucrative opportunity because the generics companies can’t afford to develop or purchase new patented technologies like the new propellant for inhalers (HFA), nor get such new tech through the long morass that is FDA. The whole field was rebranded under new patents (same old drugs, though). Glaxo-Smith-Kline was one of the big producers of CFC inhalers, but quickly jumped in for regulatory approvals of their new HFA inhalers and started making a killing again, on the SAME OLD DRUGS (not an iota of new wealth created, no better health care, no new meds, just vapid “change”)
    They had already built a Billion-dollar factory to create such inhalers.

    How did GSK know to build the factory? Well, because GSK was the company pushing the hardest for EPA and FDA to ban the CFC inhalers. As early as 1994, GSK was pushing for the ban, getting the case built up. GSK and 3M (the other major source of HFA) were the overwhelming beneficiaries of the EPA/FDA action that they had pushed for (and TEVA played it well, although I don’t think they pushed for the ban). Prices went from $7 per inhaler to $45 per inhaler. For many patients the new inhalers don’t work as well (although they were marketed as “better”). Again, no new drug, no improvement in health care, only about 2 molecules of ozone saved.

    This isn’t the right way to create wealth. It doesn’t create anything. It takes money from the patient with no added benefit, including essentially no positive effect on the ozone layer. And the increased expense of the meds, I have no doubt, caused some patients to die. This is just another time that the government has colluded with a group (this time large pharma) to take money and power from the individual, while accomplishing nothing of value whatsoever.

    • Kerry W. Greene

      They will just pass another law exmempting them just like being able to do INSIDER TRADING and not go to jail. Real equaity there AY.

  • http://www.nicaland.com daledagger

    In my adopted country we can buy Cuban cigar’s but the local cigars have as good or better reputation at half the price. TSP is in all cleaning stores and our shower heads are pre-hacked, you just have to make sure they were not ment for Usano consumption. I left years ago. Repression intolerant I guess.

    • Kerry W. Greene

      What is your new adopded country, so more of us can get away if we want to.

  • dave

    It’s been quite some time since I have read anything so incredibly ignorant and irresponsible.
    May you live a thousand years in the putrid wasteland you create.

    “Not knowing enough about the technical aspects,”
    Then shut your ignorant pie hole and at least get yourself a basic kindergarten education.

    You’re a moron Tucker.

    • http://lfb.org Jeffrey Tucker

      Dave, plenty of experts dispute any cause and effect relationship between CFCs and the Ozone, to say nothing of the efficacy of the proposed remedy. Regardless, it is despicable to make human liberty and flourishing contingent upon a forever changing scientific consensus that is seriously compromised by tax-funded grants from government. The whole tactic is rooted in the fallacy of authority and an attempt to intimidate anyone who disagrees. Your message illustrates this quite well.

    • Franklin

      “You’re a moron Tucker.”
      For direct address, the ending punctuation would be, “You’re a moron, Tucker.” Note the comma.
      It’s the same error as, “It’s the economy stupid,” written all over T-shirts in 1992; interesting how that phrase, missing comma and all, somehow became inapplicable for leftists twenty years later.
      Anyway, reconsider the point of the article, as well as Jeffrey’s reply.

  • MJM

    When the history of the early 2000s is written, it will include the fact that Jeffrey Tucker saved the world…. or at least the quality of life of the inhabitants.