Laissez Faire Today

The Laissez Faire Club Daily e-Letter

Democracy Is a Terrible System, Period

110212_lft1

The election year of 2012 reminds us of the sheer waste and lunacy of democracy. Like soccer’s World Cup or the Summer or Winter Olympics, presidential elections in the United States come every four years. The campaign is a carnival that begins the minute after a winner is declared in November.

Each successive campaign is said to be dirtier than the last. Each candidate touts change and hope, but delivers neither. No matter who wins, the government is elected, every time. Thousands of bureaucrats march off to work the day after the election no matter who wins. Four years later, the same government employees will likely go to bed early on election night not caring who wins, because their jobs, which stand in the way of freedom each and every day, will be unaffected by the election results.

The citizenry is pummeled with public service announcements to “make your voice heard.” It is your civic duty to vote. You have nothing to complain about if you don’t. But, in fact, government wants you to vote, but then sit down and shut up. Leave the governing to the professionals, while you pound your chest and wave Old Glory.

There are thousands of elections every year. Political positions from constable to governor are elected constantly. So with all of these layers of democracy — this great thing that America spends so many lives and so much money exporting — is America freer? With this constant turnover of political blood, is business allowed to operate unfettered? After all, we are led to believe democracy is synonymous with freedom. No democracy, no freedom.

America was attacked on Sept. 11 because they hate us for our freedoms, we’re told. America is so free it has the highest incarceration rate in the world, with 750 prisoners per 100,000 citizens. More than 2.3 million people are locked up, and many more millions are on probation. Is this is the upside of this great thing — democracy?

The Federal Register, a publication with all the country’s (federal, nonclassified) rules is now over 81,000 pages long. President Obama’s Affordable Care Act is 906 pages. The Dodd-Frank Act totals 849 pages. Once upon a time, in 1913, the Federal Reserve was created with only 31 pages. The U.S. Constitution required only six pages.

Democracy is getting wordier. The more words, the more pages, the more rules, the less free we become. But we still have democracy, so we must be the luckiest people in the world. This is the greatest nation in the world… because of democracy. Because we have a say.

The idea of democracy is sacrosanct. To question it implies that you are in favor of despotism and tyranny. Democracy fans conveniently ignore the fact that despots and tyrants are freely elected every year.

President Hugo Chavez retained power in Venezuela this year, winning comfortably despite running his country’s economy into the ground with his socialist revolution of nationalizing key industries, tight exchange controls, and price controls on certain basic goods.

As the European economy continued to lurch toward meltdown, French voters elected Francois Hollande in 2012. The first three things Hollande did were raise the minimum wage, reduce the retirement age from 62 to 60, and raise the top tax rate to 75%. A conspiracy theorist would assume Hollande is deliberately trying to demolish what’s left of the French economy with these policies.

In Moscow, Vladimir Putin was again elected president of Russia. Despite police repression and the thuggery of the previous Putin regime, pro-Putin rallies were much more popular than anti-Putin rallies. “This is the time to build a bridge to Putin, before the most talented people move out of Russia,” said curator Marat Gelman.

As the United States elections draw near, the incumbent president is leading or tied in the polls. In his four years, he has not really deviated from his predecessor’s policies that were generally reviled by those in his party. He has presided over the largest expansion in public debt in world history, with the result being economic growth that is the weakest since the Great Depression. And this guy is likely to win. If he doesn’t, his opponent will govern just as he (and the ones before him) did.

Those of us paying attention are left to merely sigh and roll our eyes, reminded of H.L. Mencken’s line, “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.”

Meanwhile, democracy continues on unquestioned. The politicians may be crooked, the taxes ruinous, the bureaucracy unwieldy, and the regulations outrageous, but the source of these outcomes is never questioned. The hope of democracy depends on the idea that all we need is the right people in power.

If democracy isn’t working, it’s not democracy’s fault. The problem is only that the right people have not been elected yet. This theory has been tested for hundreds of years and the results are the same, yet people still hope and believe. The worst rise to the top in politics, F.A. Hayek explained. To be elected, politicians must appeal to the least intelligent and most gullible. And because democracy makes politics and power available to everyone, it attracts those seeking status, fame, glory, recognition, attention, appreciation, dignity, and even dominance. The right people will never be attracted to politics, only the wrong people will.

To challenge democracy is brave. To do it in print is heroic. The authors of Beyond Democracy concisely dismantle the myths of democracy. If you come to this book already enlightened, their arguments will augment your arsenal. If you haven’t yet shaken democracy’s hold, your view of the world is about to be turned upside down. This is a book you will read in one sitting, and in the end its ideas will strip you of the statist baggage that has weighed you down. The world’s future, with problems that seem hopeless, will suddenly become brighter. One short book will make you understand why “no democracy” is the only path to true freedom.

Yours,

Douglas French

Author Image for Douglas French

Douglas French

Douglas E. French is senior editor of the Laissez Faire Club. He received his master's degree under the direction of Murray N. Rothbard at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, after many years in the business of banking. He is the author of three books, Early Speculative Bubbles and Increases in the Supply of Money, the first major empirical study of the relationship between early bubbles and the money supply; Walk Away, a monograph assessing the philosophy and morality of strategic default; and The Failure of Common Knowledge, which takes on many common economic fallacies. He is founder and editor of LibertyWatch magazine. Write him.

  • Pingback: Democracy Is a Terrible System, Period : Forex & Gold

  • Farmer

    I agree with Agnostic libertarian. Democracy clearly has its issues. That’s why the founders chose a different path. Look at California, where I reside, and its version of direct democracy. Each election there are a number of propositions put forth by various interest groups, including the State itself. Most people have no real idea of what they’re voting on, what the implications are, what the context is, etcetera. So, they vote based on the sound bites they get via various forms of media. And you end up with a convoluted state of affairs, bullet trains and all the rest.

    The founders not only avoided direct democracy, they went further with separation of powers,federalism and the constitution itself. Obviously, though, the Republic has gone off course. I’d like to see someone tackle the question of “how did that happen?” I’d like to see ideas about how we might return the Republic back toward its initial premises.

    Additionally, one might even pursue the more fundamental question of whether there is a true fix, a way that can endure. The founders wanted to avoid a ruler, and in particular the problems and stife they’d studied and seen in Europe. Thus, they created a government but limited its scope. However, is “limited government” an oxymoron? Once created, can a government long be contained…or is it simply inevitable that it will grow over time, morphing into something unrecognizable to those who conceptualized it? Is there something inherent in human nature that precludes the sustainability of a government limited in purpose and scope?

    I’d welcome anything that proposes fixes to our Constitutional Republic or addresses those broader fundamental issues or both.

    • Franklin

      “I’d like to see someone tackle the question of ‘how did that happen?’”
      De Tocqueville tackled it about 170 years ago.

      • Agnostic libertarian

        This is not the case. He discussed the issues which would arise from the Republic being operated as a democracy. And that is what has been the problem for quite some time.

        • Franklin

          It is precisely the case. He stated how and why the Republic would not endure, specifically. And he was prescient and correct.

    • Agnostic libertarian

      The Constitution contains the “fixes”, when viewed in conjunction with the Original Intent and the Founding Principles of this country.

      The key is the separation of powers, not horizontally within the federal government, but vertically, down from the people, through their local/states and on to the federal level.

      One great resource for information on this topic and to see some of the many successes happening today to re-institute this vertical power separation is the Tenth Amendment Center http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/ (I am not affiliated, just a fan)

      But the key to rolling back this usurpation of power from the federal government, and even the state governments, is for the people to demand the proper use of power/authority from each of these levels. The people can, as specifically intended by the Founders, leverage one level of government to restrict the abuse of the other. This process has proven successful from the very beginning of the Constitutional Republic.

      However, ignorance, laziness and apathy have lead the majority of the “owners” of this country, the people, to neglect their ownership responsibilities and duties, thus allowing a power vacuum to be filled by power grabbing politicians.

      The Founders were very clear that the power of the government, both federal and state governments, could be restrained and limited, IF THE PEOPLE DESIRED FOR THIS AND DID THEIR DUTIES AS OWNERS.

      So, today, like it was at the beginning of the American Revolution, it is the “hearts and minds” of the American people (as explained by John Adams) where the “revolution” must take place. It is not until the people of this country understand their proper role as owners of the country and they demand and enforce the limited rolls of government, leverage the Constitutional tools available to them to do so.

      The good news is that there has been a great awakening of the people of this country. The current political swing is not merely another swing of the political pendulum, from Democrat to Republican, but rather it is a swing from totalitarianism (or even democracy) back to Constitutional Republicanism. It is a move back to the Founding Principles of limited government and personal liberties/freedoms.

      This is evident by the huge surge by the people of this country to reconnect with the Founding documents, principles and working to elect those who hold such views.

      Let it be said very clearly, elections will not fix this country, but they are ONE of the tools which must be used to enact the “fix”. There are many other Constitutional tools for Liberty which MUST be exercised to be successful in this effort, and happily, they are being exercised as well.

      Again, I never understand the mentality of “checking out”. To me it is the equivalent of saying, I don’t like the idea that the motor in my car can malfunction, so I will not change the oil and tune it up. Denial of the reality that things can and do go wrong, does not make them disappear and not happen. I guess there may be some self-satisfaction in saying, “I have not changed the oil in my car for over 200,000 miles and I am still OK.” But that is not an indication of any personal superiority, it is merely living off the quality work of others before you, who built a fine automobile….just as not taking up the role of owner of this country is living on the sacrifices of those generations which have come before us. Sadly, that means that those who inherit the country from us will not inherit a well maintained country, but one that has reaped the results of another generation of neglect and abuse, resulting in more restorative needs heaped upon their shoulders.

      Each generation’s neglect is an insult to the previous generations, and a theft from the subsequent generations.

      • Farmer

        Thanks for the reference to the Tenth Amendment Center website. I’ll have to check it out. I also agree with the fact that our fate is in the hands of the people. However, I fear the slippery slope is at play. Each time there is a course correction (e.g. Reagan), we follow it with slip back to the left. We never seem to fully restore the system to the time of the previous correction. The process seems inexorable, as the people not only get comfortable with each slip, they come to believe that this is the way things should be. And it isn’t just the Dems that cause the slipping. Hence, my concern that there may be something in our very nature that gets in the way of preserving liberty and containing government over the long haul.

        • Franklin

          Course correction under Reagan?
          Federal spending, albeit at a slower pace, increased during his terms. Government, at all levels, expanded during his presidency.
          His vision was empty rhetoric, as it is, and has been, for every last one if them.

          • Farmer

            One can argue about Reagan, but there is no question that both major political parties are culpable. But it gets back to the issue of the people. As Michael S. Greve has noted : “…we actually see behind us protracted abandonment of the Founders’ flinty realism about the need to limit government because of the limitations of the people.”

  • Agnostic libertarian

    Wow, how revealing…. More whining about a straw man, and no resolutions or solutions.

    We don’t have a “democracy”, we have a Constitutional Republic (albeit it poorly operating, and well off course from original intent, but there are very real and viable solutions to these issues).

    You, and likely the authors of this book, offer NO solutions, only whining and complaining. It is a marvel to see so much B!T@HING, but no real resolutions being offered. It is really sad, to tell the truth.

    Anyone can whine and complain, but where are all the solutions/resolutions? Just crying and sitting out is not a solution or resolution. How about posting some links to what you all find as true solutions to the issues we face in this country? No smart @$$ comments about how what we have is not working, we can agree that today’s operations are not right, but YOUR IDEAS for RESOLVING the issues, not just crying about them.

    Like it or not, we have a Constitutional Republic (again, there have been those who have bastardized this system to make it unrecognizable as such, but there are NOW those who are working very successfully, to restore it.)

    And how about we dispense with the Walter Mitty fantasies of some sort of nationwide revolution wiping out the current government and establishing some much better form which will better foster Freedom and Liberty. Frankly, if there is ever a violent revolution in this country, the result will be a dictatorship.

    -Where are your examples of your ideals being implemented and successful? Any happening today? In the Past?

    Whining is easy, and evidently, sells books, but what has it every fixed?