Paperback
- Product Author
- Ron Paul
- ISBN-13
- 978-1621290391
- Publisher
- Laissez Faire Books
- Publication Date
- 2012
- Item Number
- 401SP0357
eBook
- Product Author
- Ron Paul
- ISBN-13
- 978-1621290490
- Publisher
- Laissez Faire Books
- Publication Date
- 2012
- Item Number
- 401SE0302
Description:
Subtitle: A Minority Report of the U.S. Gold Commission by Ron Paul.
This book remains the most eloquent statement for fundamental monetary reform ever penned. The Case for Gold is the minority report of the U.S. Gold Commission, and lays out a thorough and comprehensive defense of sound money. Today, The Case for Gold remains a timeless piece of scholarship, offering successive generations both a prescient warning and a path to sound currency and a stable U.S. dollar.
Ron Paul wrote a special foreword to this release just for the Laissez Faire Club. As he writes:
The need for reform has never been more urgent. I’m pleased that a revived Laissez Faire Books, an institution I depended on to provide literature in my early years in Congress, is bringing out a new edition of The Case for Gold to teach money and banking to a new generation and to show the path forward. The case for reform is fundamentally the same today as it was when it was first published. The principles never change. Freedom and sound money are inseparable. Money must be returned to the people to manage and be taken away from the government and its planning apparatus at the central bank. Socialism works in no area of life. Freedom works in every area.
This edition also includes an important appendix with detailed commentary by Lewis Lehrman from his Congressional testimony of Sept. 21, 2012. This addition brings the analysis up to date.
After Nixon cut the last strands of the U.S. dollar’s tether to gold in 1971, price inflation exploded. In 1980, with the CPI running 12.5-15%, Sen. Jesse Helms was able to get a bill calling for the Gold Commission passed. The 17-member commission initially met in September 1981. The four-hour meeting produced nothing but arguments. “We can’t even agree on the historical facts,” Treasury Secretary Donald Regan told the press at the time.
The commission was stacked with monetarists and Keynesians who were hostile to gold. The only two pro-gold members were businessman Lewis Lehrman and Congressman Paul. In the end, despite President Ronald Reagan reportedly being sympathetic, the commission formally voted against reviving a gold standard. The fiat money orthodoxy remained. The vote was, as Ron Paul wrote, “a foregone conclusion.” But the commission was not all for naught. This book arose from those meetings.
Lehrman and Paul were fighting an uphill battle. They had to assemble a bulletproof case for a return to gold, and this book is that case. This issue is white-hot again after years of Federal Reserve monetary pumping. The gold discussion is no longer the territory of just conspiracy theorists and historians.
Although published three decades ago, Paul and Lehrman’s book will stun you with its relevance. The first sentence reads, “The United States is now in the most-serious recession since the 1930s.”
At the time, the U.S. was only a decade into a dangerous monetary experiment that was unique in the nation’s history. There was no circulating gold and silver, replaced by paper money managed by central bank bureaucrats. The results were high inflation, a stagnant economy, and high interest rates. Today, it is deja vu, with the exception of interest rates that have been pinned down (for now) by the central bank.
The continual monetary expansion during the 30 years since the Gold Commission met and rejected gold has seen a continual string of asset bubbles and ruinous crashes. Stocks, real estate, commodities, art, and so on have all taken turns at being the focus of money-induced manias, only to crash spectacularly, in turn destroying both precious capital and people’s savings and livelihoods.
Many commentators blame capitalism for these booms and busts, when, in fact, it is a paper money system controlled by government force that creates this destructive chaos. The Case for Gold is more than a wonky policy paper. Roughly half of the book is devoted to the history of money and banking in the U.S. Another large section is devoted to free banking and private coinage throughout history. The authors thank Murray Rothbard (along with Christopher Weber and John Robbins) in their acknowledgements, and Rothbard fans won’t have to read far, especially in the history section, to detect his influence.
The authors answer critics that claim the gold standard has failed throughout history, pointing out that it was men and governments that failed by abusing various versions of the gold standard. The yellow metal itself has never failed. It’s the money that built modern civilization.
Why gold, you ask? The authors didn’t choose it. The market picked gold centuries ago. The yellow metal emerged as best for indirect exchange. It is after all, marketable, divisible, portable, stable in value, durable, recognizable, and homogenous. The perfect money.
The use of paper money is only continued under the boot of government force and coercion.
The blueprint for change was written 30 years ago. The Case for Gold deserves a real second chance.


JOBINHO – :
I watched the dtebae last night. I saw the interview with some of the audience. The interviewers asked them who was the biggest loser. They all said in unison Ron Paul. I think Ron Paul had the most intelligent and statements, although some of them veered off topic. He got his point across and the other candidates only stared at him with smug smiles. I think Ron Paul won the dtebae. The audience who said he did not win clearly were biased from the beginning and never listened to Paul. But who cares about them? The bright side is that there for the first time since Barry Goldwater is a Republican Party Presidential nominee candidate who is a true honest to goodness Republican. He is making a point that yes, it is possible for the Republican Party to return to its roots. I’m voting in the Arizona Primary (absentee ballot) for Ron Paul. I don’t expect him to be the Republican nominee. In that case, I will switch my party back to the Libertarian Party and work hard for the LP candidate.