1. 

   5 out of 5

   aRVbmrWSctlieEtvx – September 15, 2012:
2. 

   5 out of 5

   Danno – November 21, 2012:

   Simple, easy read that takes the reader inexorably to an understanding of the evil of legal redistribution. I can’t recommend it highly enough; I give about a half-dozen copies of this away every year, with the condition that it never be returned, but always passed on to another.

Add Review

1. 

   5 out of 5

   Jeffrey Tucker – April 26, 2012:

   What is the law and what should it be? This is the bigger question that is not part of public consciousness.

   The same was true in the time of Frédéric Bastiat (1801–1850). At the very end of his life, he wrote an impassioned plea on the topic. He tried to get people to think and think hard about what was happening and how law had become an instrument of plunder rather than a protector of property.

   He wrote: “It is not true that the function of law is to regulate our consciences, our ideas, our wills, our education, our opinions, our work, our trade, our talents or our pleasures. The function of law is to protect the free exercise of these rights, and to prevent any person from interfering with the free exercise of these same rights by any other person.”

   This is from Bastiat’s The Law, one of the great political essays to emerge from the whole Continental world of the 19th century. This essay asks fundamental questions that most people go through life never having thought about. This book is part of Laissez Faire Books’ set of new works that seeks to find what is essential in the literature and distribute it in news ways

   The problem is that most people accept the law as a given, a fundamental fact. As a member of society, you obey or face the consequences. It is safe not to question why. This is because the enforcement arm of the law is the state, that peculiar agency with a unique power in society to use legal force against life and property. The state says what the law is — however this decision was made — and that settles it.

   Bastiat could not accept this. He wanted to know what the law is, apart from what the state says it is. He saw that the purpose of law is, most fundamentally, to protect private property and life against invasion, or, at least, to ensure that justice is done in cases in which such invasions do take place. This is hardly a unique idea; it is a summary of what philosophers, jurists, and theologians have thought in most times and places.

   Then he takes that next step, the one that opens the reader’s eyes as nothing else. He subjects the state itself to the test of whether it, the state itself, complies with that idea of law.

   He takes notice, even from the first paragraph, that the state itself turns out to be a lawbreaker in the name of law keeping. It does the very thing that law is supposed to prevent. Instead of protecting private property, it invades it. Instead of protecting life, it destroys it. Instead of guarding liberty, it violates it. And as the state advances and grows, it does this ever more, to become a threat to the well-being of society itself.

   Even more tellingly, Bastiat observes that when you subject the state to the same standards that the law uses to judge relations between individuals, the state fails. He concludes that when this is the case, the law has been perverted in the hands of the governing elites. It is employed to do the very thing that the law is designed to prevent. The enforcer turns out to be the main violator of its own standards.

   The passion, the fire, the relentless logic have the power to shake up most any reader. Nothing is the same. This is why this monograph is rightly famous. It is capable of shaking up whole systems of government and whole societies. What a beautiful illustration of the power of the pen.

   But take notice of Bastiat’s rhetorical approach here. His conclusion is at the beginning. Why? He did not have that much time (he died not long after writing The Law). He knew that the reader didn’t either. He wanted to raise consciousness and persuade in the most effective way. Even from a stylistic point of view, there is much to learn from his approach.

   Laissez Faire Books is honored to give new life to this remarkable document in this edition, which revives the translation by Dean Russell. It also includes an introduction by Bill Bonner, who gets my vote for the most underrated voice in defense of old-style liberalism in the world today. He explains how Bastiat’s essay open his eyes to see the world in a new way.

   It is a habit of every generation to underestimate the importance and power of ideas. And yet the whole world that we live in is built by them. Nothing outside the pure nature of nature exists in this world that did not begin as an idea held by human beings. This is why a book like this is so powerful and important. It helps you see injustices that surround us that we are otherwise inclined to ignore. And seeing is the first step to changing.

   That’s why it continues to be printed and circulated and why every living soul should read it. If we are to see a renewed appreciation of the idea of liberty in our lifetimes, this monograph written so long ago in a country so far away will deserve a great deal of the credit.

Add Review