Demand for One of the World’s Rarest Assets Is Set to Boom
In 1789, Thomas Jefferson departed France for the United States, on board a boat housing a secret investment.
It was an extremely rare commodity. One that’s been desired for thousands of years. Read on...
Melanoma is on the rise. So is sunscreen use. Coincidence?
Turns out your body actually makes a couple…
Water. Everyone's thinking about it. Everyone's drinking it. But what's in it, really? And how do you make sure yours is clean? Chris Campbell investigates...
Check you fridge for these recalled products.
A Note From The Club Director
Kleptocracy (n.) — a government or state in which those in power exploit national resources and steal; rule by a thief or thieves.
For the past five years, 605 of the most influential Fortune 500 CEOs, VPs, and lobbyists have been secretly crafting a massive international trade deal on behalf of the U. Read on...
Exactly how to get this powerful hydrogen-rich water
The FDA has banned trans fats. But is that really a good thing?
Can this kind of water make you younger?
Millions of people are diagnosed with hypothyroidism each year. And most of them have to take medication for years, if not the rest of their life. But there is a simple mineral deficiency that mimics a lot of the symptoms of hypothyroidism. It’s a lot easier to correct, and you won’t need to take medication if that’s actually what’s causing your hypothyroidism symptoms.
To get free, unlimited access to these books and 100s more, join the Laissez Faire Book Club.Of Trade
by David Hume
Release Date: July 9, 2015
David Hume was a famous Scottish philosopher of the 18th century and one of the great defenders of free international trade. Read on...
You all wrote in with some great tips and recommendations for water filtration. In fact, the inbox is overflowing.
Could free radicals be like a zombie apocalypse for your body?
There's a mental health crisis occurring in America. And the cures are in the least expected of places: psychedelics. Chris Campbell investigates...
There’s something in your water that could be harming your health
How we spot the lies about supplements
Chances are good this “medicine” is in your home right now. Here’s why you should never use it again.
Just how messed up is our medical system? You won’t believe how many people die from FDA-approved drugs.
I have mad love for doctors…within a certain context. If an infection is involved or surgery must be performed, fine. But if they start telling me to eat a low-fat diet with plenty of grains for my health, or there’s nothing wrong with artificial sweeteners, the best they’re going to get from me is a barely-polite nod.
One of them might be a threat, and the other is a complete fraud…
How many of your fellow readers would already take testosterone? The results might surprise you…
If you take a statin you absolutely must make sure you have adequate levels of this vitamin.
It may be one of the biggest modern health trends, as thousands of men jump on the bandwagon
Are certain foods causing your joint pain? Here’s an easy way to find out.
The TPP, if made into law, could affect nearly every aspect of your day-to-day life. This includes a huge hit on your freedom of speech, and your ability to receive cost-effective healthcare. Read on…
How my mother inspires me to be healthier, and what she’s doing to feel 20 years younger without traditional exercise
How lifting weights can go wrong, and cause your body more damage than health.
If springtime allergies have you trapped indoors, try one of these 7 natural ways to get some relief.
Professor John H. Cochrane of the University of Chicago had an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal on Dec. 25, in which he gave a brief description of (among other things) a market in which individuals buy our own health insurance — and not from an Obamacare exchange.
According to Professor Cochrane: “…we should transition to fully individual-based health insurance”. This is the Holy Grail of free-market reformers, and likely unattainable as long as Obamacare’s political opponents are unwilling to take the risk of a reform that can be twisted as “taking away” employer-based benefits. (Although, as I have described in a previous article, the task would not be impossible if free-market reformers improved our communications skills.)
In Professor Cochrane’s approach, each individual would buy health insurance that actually combines two policies. The first would cover the beneficiary for catastrophic illness and accidents this year. The second, called health-status insurance, is insurance against being underwritten again in future years.
Traditional employer-based coverage is re-underwritten every year (sometimes within limits prescribed by state laws). Before Obamacare, individual insurance was never re-underwritten, but that fell apart if the beneficiary switched insurers. Healthy beneficiaries found it easy to switch insurers, but people who became sick were forced to stay with their plans, even if they preferred to switch.
Obamacare addresses this problem by forcing health insurers to accept everyone, without regard to health status, at the same premium (with some variation for age). With Professor Cochrane’s health-status insurance, a patient who is diagnosed with an expensive condition, who wants to move from one insurer to another, takes with him a sum of money (from the previous insurer) that will cover the higher premiums. The whole model is best explained by Professor Cochrane in a paper he wrote in 2009.
How can we get there, in a world where everyone who promotes the idea will be accused of “taking away” citizens’ employer-based benefits? The ground is being prepared with a relatively recent innovation: Private health-benefit exchanges.
According to a recent survey sponsored by a coalition of employers’ groups, 45% of employers have or are considering using private exchanges to offer health benefits to their employees before 2018. A November survey by David Franklin of the independent equity research firm Blueshift reported similarly high interest in private exchanges.
Most employers going into private exchanges are self-insured. That is, they take advantage of a federal law (ERISA) to avoid buying state-regulated health insurance and bear all the risk of medical spending for their beneficiaries. The health benefit is managed by a third-party administrator (TPA) or health insurer on an administrative-services only (ASO) basis. The most important thing to understand is that the insurer does not bear actuarial risk, as they usually do for smaller groups. (The employer can buy re-insurance to limit its risk.)
An employer wishing to use a private exchange, organized by a benefits consultant, can retain self-insured status. However, some experts surveyed in Mr. Franklin’s report thought that this was unlikely to persist. A private exchange provides a mechanism for an employer to make a fixed contribution to an employee’s coverage, which he can use to select a health plan from a portfolio on the private exchange. For the employer to continue to bear the risk of high medical claims in such a situation makes little sense, according to some experts, including sources with whom I have spoken.
So, what is emerging is large employers contributing fixed dollars to employees for them to buy state-regulated insurance from a portfolio in an exchange organized by a benefits consultant. To clarify: ACME, Inc., for example, as employees all over the country. Those employees are covered by a national, self-insured, ERISA plan, likely administered under a national contract with a benefits consultant. The benefits consultant has assembled a national network of providers by renting a large number of local provider networks. All the medical claims flow through the consultant to ACME for payment.
In the new world, the consultant organizes an exchange and solicits insurers in states where ACME has offices to join it. Employees now have a choice of state-regulated plans. ACME gives each employee a fixed contribution to pay premiums.
If private exchanges continue to grow as anticipated, it is easy to see how they could ease the transition into a future of individual health insurance, post-Obamacare.
Say an employee in Northern California quits ACME and joins ZIPPY, Ltd. There’s a chance that ZIPPY uses the same benefits consultant, or that the consultant who organizes ZIPPY’s network in Northern California has almost the same portfolio of insurers in its exchange as the previous consultant did. In that case, there need be no disruption of coverage whatsoever. The employer making the defined contribution changes, but the beneficiary’s plan stays the same.
As years go by, the culture will change. If potential employees already have plans that they like, they will be less likely to join employers that don’t have those plans on their exchanges. Consultants will anticipate this by ensuring that almost all insurers in an area are available in their exchanges. People will begin to think of health insurance as their personal asset, not a benefit granted by their employers.
Once this cultural change has taken place, we will be a long way towards our goal of freeing every American to choose health insurance that suits him, instead of his employer or the government. Free-market health reformers should cheer the rise of private health exchanges.
— John R. Graham
This article originally appeared here on the Independent Institute website.